Should the UK purchase Eurofighter over F35?

With the strategic defence review due at any time, and with the UK retiring it’s tranche 1 Eurofighter Typhoons, the need to bolster front-line fast jet numbers has become even more important at a time of fragility in geopolitics. It’s almost a carbon copy of the 1930’s before WW2, when the UK was ill-equipped and under prepared for War. With low equipment numbers and personnel, the UK is heading for a showdown it can’t currently win. We can’t just rely on superior technology; we need mass as well. With the low numbers of both Typhoon and F35 in the RAF currently, we need to accelerate a plan to purchase more of either or both of these aircraft.

The decision between purchasing the Eurofighter Typhoon and the F-35 Lightning II is a complex one, with a range of factors to consider. Both aircraft have strengths, but they also have different capabilities and strategic implications. Here's an overview of the key points:

Eurofighter Typhoon

Pros:

• Established and Proven in Service: The Eurofighter has been in service for a while, and many air forces (including the UK) already operate it. It’s a well-understood platform with a solid track record.
• Air Superiority: The Typhoon is designed for air-to-air combat, with excellent agility, speed, and a high degree of manoeuvrability. It excels in controlling the skies.
• Multi-Role Capability: While it’s primarily a fighter, the Typhoon can be adapted for ground attack missions, reconnaissance, and other roles with upgrades.
• Operational Flexibility: Being a European project, the Typhoon’s components and maintenance facilities are widely available, which could provide more operational flexibility within NATO and European contexts.

Cons:

• Limited Stealth: The Typhoon lacks significant stealth capabilities compared to the F-35, making it more vulnerable to modern radar systems in highly contested environments.
• Less Advanced Sensor Fusion: The Typhoon doesn’t have the same level of integrated systems and sensor fusion as the F-35, which gives the latter a technological edge in networked warfare.
• Airframe Design: While excellent in air superiority, the Typhoon is not as capable as the F-35 in strike missions or operating in contested environments with modern anti-air defences.

F-35 Lightning II

Pros:

• Stealth and Low Observability: The F-35’s stealth capabilities are a huge advantage, allowing it to operate in highly contested airspace where traditional aircraft might be vulnerable.
• Advanced Sensor Fusion: The F-35 integrates its sensors (radar, infrared, and others) into a unified system, providing unparalleled situational awareness. This is crucial in modern combat, where understanding the battlespace is as important as firepower.
• Multi-Role Capability: The F-35 is designed for a wide range of roles—air-to-air, air-to-ground, electronic warfare, intelligence gathering, and more. This flexibility is enhanced by its ability to operate from a variety of platforms, including aircraft carriers.
• Future-Proof: The F-35 is part of a larger, long-term program with continual updates, ensuring it stays relevant in future conflicts. It also operates in a joint, networked environment, which improves interoperability with NATO allies.

Cons:

• Cost: The F-35 is considerably more expensive than the Eurofighter, both in terms of acquisition and maintenance. This has been a significant issue for many countries.
• Reliability and Development Delays: The F-35 program has faced development challenges, including delays and issues with certain systems. While it’s generally considered reliable now, the early stages of the program had more teething problems.
• Less Agile in Dogfights: While the F-35 is highly capable in many areas, it doesn’t match the agility of the Eurofighter in close-quarters dogfighting. However, modern air combat is shifting away from traditional dogfights to networked, missile-based engagements.

Strategic Considerations for the UK

• Interoperability with Allies: The UK is part of NATO and has strong ties to the US. The F-35 is already in service with a number of NATO allies, which could make integration into multinational operations smoother.
• Future Threats: The F-35 is designed with future threats in mind, particularly advanced air defence systems and peer adversaries like Russia and China. Its stealth and sensor capabilities are vital for countering these threats.
• Economic Considerations: The Eurofighter is cheaper in terms of procurement and potentially operational costs. The UK MOD may prefer to invest in a greater number of Typhoons for air defence, especially with budget constraints.
• Carrier Operations: The Royal Navy operates the F-35B variant (short take-off and landing), which is designed for use on aircraft carriers. If the MOD seeks to maintain a powerful carrier strike capability, the F-35 is essential.

Conclusion

If the UK prioritises air superiority, cost-effectiveness, and a well-proven aircraft for its current needs, the Eurofighter Typhoon might be the better choice.

If the MOD is looking towards future-proofing its air fleet, emphasising stealth, multirole capabilities, sensor fusion, and interoperability with allies, the F-35 would be the more strategic option.

Ultimately, both aircraft serve different purposes, and the MOD may choose to operate both, as it already does with the F-35B and Eurofighter. However, if a new purchase decision is on the table, the UK's specific operational needs, budget, and long-term defence strategy will determine the best choice.

HUMAN TOUCH | RELATIONSHIP | PASSION | KNOWLEDGE | INTEREST | INTEGRITY